What do you use as your digital photo-manager and editor? I’ve used iphoto, Photoshop, and Adobe Bridge and there were a number of things that I didn’t care for about all three of them, together and separate.
Do you remember when I announced that my brilliant husband bought me Apple’s Aperture? I am using it with Photoshop. I still have a lot to learn about Aperture’s capabilities, but so far I am in love. Let me tell you my current top ten reasons Aperture has already proven itself amazing. I’m sure with time, I’ll have a whole new set of ten to add.
1. I can do everything from one page. I can scroll through my thumbnails in the manager and edit the photos on the same screen. With other systems you have to select a photo and open it to an editing page or, worse, wait for your external editor (such as Photoshop) to load. Being able to edit on the same page that contains the thumbnails means I can edit many photos in the amount of time I used to only be able to edit one. It’s fast.
2. I can do everything from one page. Okay, I know I just said that. But there’s a more specific reason this feature helps me. Oftentimes, I’m not sure whether some photos are keepers or not until I’ve had a chance to increase exposure, crop, or fiddle around a bit. When I am trying to make a quick sweep through a new set of photos in order to choose which ones I’ll delete, or which I’ll post to the blog, I can make some quick initial adjustments in order to make a decision. What used to take me an entire sitting, I can now accomplish in a few minutes.
3. Aperture saves your work for you. As in, it saves as you go. You don’t have to decide whether to save each photo as a TIFF, PSD, or JPEG. You don’t have to pick out a name for the photos (although you can). You don’t have to wait for the computer to save what you’ve done. And you don’t have to worry about losing your work in case the computer shuts down or gets stuck.
4. No matter how much or how many times you edit a photo, you never lose the original RAW version. When you are editing a photo, you are only editing a version of the RAW photo, not the original. With the click of a button, Aperture will produce another version of the original RAW photo at any time.
In addition to the obvious benefits of never losing your original photo, this feature allows you to play around with as many edited versions of a photo that you want. You can make a black and white version, a maxed-out hyper-saturated one, and a traditional one. You could crop ten different ways and create as many versions of one photo that you want. You never have to worry about losing your original.
5. Aperture allows you to “stack” photos in order to free up space in your manager. Making numerous versions of a photo could really take up a lot of room, decreasing the number of thumbnails in your viewfinder. No worries. You can stack all those versions together. Five versions can take up the space of one thumbnail. Unstack them with one click to see them again.
You can also stack sets of photos. For example, stack all your Easter ‘07 photos together, all your Mother’s Day ‘07 photos together, and the ten you took of little Jimmy taking a bath. That way, each thumbnail in your manager can represent an entire event. Right now I have all of mine visible, but I because it is halfway through the year and my 2007 library is getting large, I plan to stack by event pretty soon.
6. Aperture provides foolproof cropping. Do you ever crop a photo, only to decide weeks later that you’re not happy with it? In Aperture, all I have to do is click on the crop button and it shows me the entire photo again, with my cropped version lit up. I can pull the corners out or push them in. What I don’t have to do is try to find the original, if it’s even still there. Of course, an original version is all always one click away.
7. Aperture can read the metadata off photos from a cd that someone else burned for you. My mother sent me a cd of pictures from Christmas that she burned at Sam’s Club. Even though I didn’t upload the photos into Aperture directly from her camera, Aperture recorded all the metadata: the dates she took the photos, the camera settings, etc.
8. Aperture automatically arranges those photos by when they were taken. The software I used before ordered them by the date that I uploaded them. The Christmas photos from my mother would have shown up in March when I finally uploaded them. Since Aperture reads and records the metadata, even from a cd, it arranges the photos by the actual photo date.
This comes in handy when I am scrapbooking and want to know the date of a particular event. Aperture takes care of recording the dates for me.
9. Aperture is a great editor for everyday photos. I wasn’t satisfied with iPhoto as an editor, so I only used it to manage my photos when I uploaded them. Then I opened almost every single shot in Photoshop to edit them. After that I saved them to be stored in Adobe Bridge. I had photos in separate places and it was a very slow process to edit each photo in Photoshop.
Admittedly, Aperture is not as good at editing as Photoshop is, but it is good enough for 99% of my photos. I really like its editing capabilities with a few exceptions (Photoshop makes up for those). In fact, I only use Photoshop now for a rare shot that needs special attention, or if I want to add text or save in unusual sizes. I wish I could tell you how much time this saves me!
10. I prefer using Aperture with Photoshop than using Adobe Bridge with Photoshop. I know that Adobe designed Photoshop and Bridge to work together. But I find using Aperture with Bridge is a much smoother process.
When you click on a photo in Aperture and request it to open in Photoshop, Aperture opens a second version of that photo for you to work on. After making all your adjustments in Photoshop, all you have to do is hit SAVE (not SAVE AS) and it will automatically adjust the version in Aperture. This means you can go back in the future and readjust in Photoshop as often as you want. It also saves a lot of time and space to not have to save with a new name and designate its type (such as, TIFF or JPEG).
The only limitation I have found is when I create a new canvas and drag one or more photos into the new canvas. In this case, it seems I have to save it in Photoshop and then add it to Aperture manually as a new photo. It’s not a bad deal when I consider all the other benefits.
After switching my system around a few times and never feeling completely satisfied with iPhoto, Photoshop, and Adobe Bridge, I cannot believe I am so happy with Aperture. It’s hard to believe a system can run so smoothly. And then I wonder why all the other systems do run this way!
If you will be shopping for a new editor or manager in the future, Aperture is the one to get.